Most likely oak; alternatives include ash or chestnut
Quercus spp. (species uncertain) · Hardwood
AI-generated identification · may be incorrect- Type
- Hardwood
- Origin
- Likely North America or Europe; exact origin cannot be determined visually.
- Hardness
- Approximately 1,000–1,350 lbf, Medium to Hard; species-dependent.
- Durability
- Moderately Durable; oak heartwood generally resists decay better than sapwood, but this cannot be confirmed from the fragment.
Got a wood sample like this?
Identify any wood from a photo, free.
Grain Pattern
Strongly straight, coarse longitudinal grain; appears radially or rift-oriented, with prominent open pores and no evident decorative figure.
Color & Appearance
Pale tan to medium brown with darker earlywood lines; subdued luster. The blue lighting prevents reliable assessment of natural color or aging.
Hardness (Janka)
Approximately 1,000–1,350 lbf, Medium to Hard; species-dependent.
Durability & Decay Resistance
Moderately Durable; oak heartwood generally resists decay better than sapwood, but this cannot be confirmed from the fragment.
Value & Age
Common oak: roughly $5–$12 per board foot; figured or antique material may be higher.
AI estimate for general guidance only — not a professional appraisal. Actual value depends on grade, dimensions, condition, and local market demand.
- Wood Age Estimate
- Not estimable; the fragment shows little reliable patina or wear evidence and may be recently cut.
Common Uses
Furniture, flooring, cabinetry, veneer, beams, barrels, and tool handles.
Geographic Origin
Likely North America or Europe; exact origin cannot be determined visually.
Workability
Generally machines and sands well, though coarse grain can tear out; predrilling is advisable and tannins may darken around iron fasteners.
Finish Recommendations
Sand progressively and apply dye, oil, shellac, lacquer, or polyurethane; use a washcoat or sanding sealer for more uniform absorption.
Notable Features
Visible large pores and alternating darker growth bands are oak-like; end-grain detail is insufficient for definitive identification.